Archive

Archive for October, 2009

Surviving a Hard Left!

October 14th, 2009

Today I am flying the South Carolina State Flag.  Everything is relatively quiet so it is a good time for some in-depth reflection. I’m highlighting Bob Shoup’s article I found on the Canada Free Press Online site that I hope draws your attention and thoughts.

Politically Quiet

Politically Quiet

Today, I’m letting someone else do my work for me, and knowing me as a devout  Capitalist, you know how difficult that is for me!  However, when you discover someone already has spoken your thoughts, and probably better than you could have spoken or written them, then it is wise to quote the person and simply point to the source of information  proliferating the wisdom of such a person.  Today I’m highlighting Bob Shoup’s (bio) article on the Canada Free Press Online entitled: “Can America Survive its Sharp Left Turn?

Bob Shoup

Bob Shoup

From Bob Shoup’s article: In November of 2008, with the assistance of a compliant media, a poorly educated electorate, and widespread dissatisfaction with the Republican Party’s abandonment of its conservative base, the Democrats swept to power in 2009. In less than one year, President Obama, with the help of Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, and a gaggle of radical czars, has steered our Country into a sharp turn to the left.

I offer the above as a teaser for you to go read the entire, thoughtful, article. You can see from this first paragraph of his article that he can cover a great deal of “political geography” in very few words.  Here are the discussed subjects you will find in the article:

  • The Left’s World View
  • The Left’s Moral Compass
  • Freedom from Consequences
  • The Ends Justify the Means
  • The Left’s Loyalty
  • The Left’s View of Business
  • The Left’s Tolerance
  • The Left’s Hypocrisy
  • So is America Threatened by the Left?

You will find each of these subjects well-discussed with thoughtful commentary. I hope you go to the Canada Free Press Online and Read Bob Shoup’s Article.


The Bottom Line


* * * * *

Please take the time to read the article. It is something I fully intend to refer to in future posts.  I think you will be enlightened at Bob’s view on each of the above subjects. His comments are loaded with talking points for you. I  certainly learned a great deal from his comments, I hope you do too.

Your thoughts? I would be interested in any thoughts you may have as to HOW or IF we will survive the hard left turn our country has taken.  I’ll add my thoughts in the comments area.  To comment, just click on the “comment” link at the top of the post.

Our Thanks: To Canada Free Press Online for publishing the article and to Bob Shoup for sharing it with all of us.

S.C. Flag - Relatively Calm

Snow(e) Creates Slippery Slope

October 14th, 2009

Today I am flying the Navy Union Jack. Liberty was threatened yesterday when Olympia Snowe’s vote on the Senate Committee’s Health Care bill made it “bi-partisan.”  Republicans, allowing this behavior from within the party, will lose the next election just as easily they lost the last one.  The result  threatens Liberty AND Freedom.

Liberty Threatened

Liberty Threatened

President Obama: “After many months of thoughtful deliberation, the fifth and final committee responsible for health care reform has passed a proposal that has both Democratic and Republican support,” the president said. “After the consideration of hundreds of amendments, it includes ideas from both Democrats and Republicans, which is why it enjoys the support of people from both parties.” (From Salon.com)

A Party of ONE! - A Weak Link!

A Party of ONE! Weak Link!

Salon.com: What he didn’t say was that, in seeming contrast to his message, Snowe was the only Republican on the Finance Committee to vote for the bill. She may end up being the only Republican senator to vote for the final legislation; indeed, given recent history, she could be the only member of the GOP in all of Congress to support whatever Democratic proposal finally emerges.

Its Not Health Care, its a TAX!

  • It would reduce payments to health-care providers, such as hospitals, by more than $400 billion over the next decade.  (who makes up this deficit? … rationing?).
  • The biggest proposed tax would raise some $200 billion from a levy on high-value health plans.
  • The legislation would raise more than $380 billion in taxes and fees over the same period. Insurers, medical-device makers and drug companies would be subject to additional fees, raising tens of billions of dollars.
  • Would tax insurers offering plans valued at more than $231,000 for a family of $8,000 for an individual. New taxes on health industries including drug and device makers.

(An excellent “Putting it Together” summary from the Wall Street Journal:  HERE)

CanadaFreePress.com Democrats don’t need Republicans to pass the health care bill. They just needed Republicans for political cover in case it blows up later. That “cover” would be that the bill was “bipartisan”. If health care passes, blame Snowe.


The Bottom Line


* * * * *

The "Right" reaching to the "Left"

The "Right" reaching to the "Left"

A Weak Link: Drudge this morning (10/14/2009) featured Snowe as the “Party of One: She’s All Alone.“  But we also know a weak link in a strong chain determines the strength and integrity of the entire chain. By voting for this disguised tax bill, Olympia Snowe has determined the potential fate of the Republican Party for 2010.  With her vote in the Senate Financial Committee , she has created a slippery slope for the beginnings of a sure conservative loss in 2010! This makes her “anti-Republican” and she should be treated as such by the Republicans.

Republicans are only as strong as their weakest link(s). It is time for “conservative Republicans” to begin demonstrating outrage at any fellow “Republican” who votes outside a strong party line stating NO MORE TAXES!  They also must begin to show outrage at party members who “stray” into liberal territory … “reaching across the isle” toward “liberal” bipartisanship.

Just say No! Bipartisanship?  Today it means “siding with the left.”  It is that simple. No ideas from the left are moved to the right. The only direction is “toward left.”  Do we see any Democrat coming across the isle to try to reduce taxes?  The only movement is Republicans reaching to the left to “make less taxes.”  That doesn’t get the job done.  Anything to the left of the conservative position should be met with the motto:  Just Say No!

PartyOfKNOW

YES! say NO!

YES! Just Say NO!

(“YES” to Freedom and Liberty, “NO” to Socialism and taxes!)

  • No to higher taxes
  • No to illegal immigration
  • No to federally funded abortion
  • No to Cap and Trade
  • No to the redistribution of wealth!
  • No to any further usurpation of Liberty and Freedom from American Citizens.

A Weak Platform for 2010? If the Republicans like Graham, McCain and Snowe continue to reach across the isle, the Republicans will NOT have a platform upon which to stand in 2010.  The President said the Health Care vote was “bipartisan” … which means, with Snowe’s vote, the entire Republican Party is now “tainted” with supporting this huge tax on America. Example: Obama saying this vote was a “bipartisan effort” . This taints any future Republican Platform, unless Snowe is held as an example of what the Republican Party DOES NOT represent. If they do not make an example of her,  then they again appear as the same “moderate-leaning” Republican Party that lost the last election. And they will lose in 2010.

Only as strong as the weakest linkRein them in! The RNC had better start reigning these people in because these weak links are going to destroy anything the Republicans could “stand for” in 2010.  I want to hear some outrage … and all I hear is silence.  Does silence equal acceptance?  I’d like to hear Michael Steele tell us what Republicans stand for and basically tell Olympia Snow, Lindsey Graham and John McCain that they are either “with us or they are against us.”  And if they are against us, then simply leave the party and stop using RNC dollars to support your own personal causes!

  • Been There, Done That. The Republicans already tried the “moderate” approach … reaching across the isle in the last election. The next similar result (from doing the same thing again?) will be a political disaster that may well be the final ruination of the United States of America.  Moderation, mixed with Liberalism is a recipe of poison for Liberty and Freedom. Always has been, always will be!

Follow the Money! The other way to solve this problem is something YOU and I can do.  Stop funding the RNC.  Only send contributions to CONSERVATIVE candidates.  If the money starts drying up, changes will have to be made. But as long as you support the RNC that is allowing it’s members to rebuild a “Party of Maybe” … then nothing will change. And nothing changing means a continued move toward the USA becoming a socialist country.

Do you want to financially support Conservatism?  Here is a place to go:

The Senate Conservatives Fund

The Senate Conservatives Fund

1st Navy Union Jack - Liberty Threatened

USA Slips to #3 (2009 Fin. Dev. Rpt.)

October 13th, 2009

Today I am flying the Fort Moultrie Flag.  Is the USA headed from one of the most stable financial systems in the world to 3rd?  Our economy is at risk, and therefore so is our Liberty.

Talk Risking Liberty

Economics Risk Liberty

The World Economic Forum just came out with their 2009 “Financial Stability Ranking” List. The United States has fallen from 1st to 3rd in the world ranking. Australia and the United Kingdom are now ranked higher in financial development.

WEF Site: The report ranks 55 of the world’s leading financial systems and capital markets. It analyses the drivers of financial system development and economic growth in developed and developing countries to serve as a tool for countries to benchmark themselves and establish priorities for reform. The rankings are based on over 120 variables spanning institutional and business environments, financial stability, and size and depth of capital markets, among other factors.

FinancialStabilityAFinancialStabilityB

Commodities Now: Now, with the publication of this, the second Financial Development Report, as leaders take stock of the efficacy of their actions, thoughts turn to the implications of this crisis on the assumptions on which our global financial system is based, and the legacy of this response.


The Bottom Line


Economy going DOWN!

Economy going DOWN!

The United States slipped to #3 on the (2-year old, and relatively new) Financial Development Report. Australia has now superseded the USA on this chart.  As Commodities Now states, this rating is an indicator to world leaders how their policies are working in relationship to other national economies.  At this point, the administration will continue to say “Its Bush’s Fault” … but they won’t be able to say that much longer.

Little wonder. We have unemployment of nearly 10% and therefore a stimulus that has not increased jobs. Our currency is worth less every day as we print money to compensate for the out-of-control spending of the Obama Administraation, backed by the Democrat congress.  The result of these policies are beginning to show in the world economic mix … and the indicator demonstrated by the Financial Development Report for 2009  is not good.

What Indicator will it take to get the attention of this administration and congress that the USA, with thiese policies is heading in the wrong direction … toward the ranking of Obama’s good friend Hugo Chavez in Venezuela?

"Changing" for the worse?

"Changing" for the worse?

Ft Moultrie Flag - Liberty Risky Discussion

Obama may ban Fishing!

October 12th, 2009

Today I am flying the 1st Navy Union Jack. I fly this Patriot Flag when Liberty is threatened.  President Obama’s new Interagency Ocean Policy Task Force is recommending limiting SPORTS fishing in some saltwater areas on our coasts and freshwater withing the United States! The document is “up” for public comment. Now he has DONE IT with an Executive Order.


UPDATE: 08.11.10 … it really doesn’t matter what the American Public wants, Obama just goes ahead and does anything he wants.  What a perfect example of a man who was “elected but would be King” …

Executive Order by Obama: (09.18.10) WASHINGTON, DC, July 20, 2010 (ENS) – President Barack Obama has established a national ocean policy that will for the first time create a coordinated system for managing America’s oceans, coasts and Great Lakes. In an Executive Order issued Monday, President Obama adopted the final recommendations of the Interagency Ocean Policy Task Force that has been gathering facts and drafting the policy since June 2009.

The order creates a National Ocean Council to implement the new policy.

Marine management under this policy will be “ecosystem-based,” which means that regulation of specific activities, such as oil and gas development, will take into account impacts on the broader ecosystems that could be affected.

The California coast at Santa Barbara (Photo by Paul Rumsey)

For the first time, it provides for the development of coastal and marine spatial plans that build upon and improve existing federal, state, tribal, local, and regional decisionmaking and planning processes.

Marine spatial planning is intended to protect ocean ecosystems and minimize conflicts between new and existing ocean uses through science-based decision making and the involvement of stakeholders and the public.

EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson said, “The new national policy provides a clear road map for all federal agencies to work together, with local partners, to protect our vital waters for future generations.”

The regional plans “will enable a more integrated, comprehensive, ecosystem-based, flexible, and proactive approach to planning and managing sustainable multiple uses across sectors and improve the conservation of the ocean, our coasts, and the Great Lakes,” Obama states in the Executive Order.

“President Obama recognized that our uses of the ocean are expanding at a rate that challenges our ability to manage significant and often competing demands,” said Nancy Sutley, chair of the White House Council on Environmental Quality, who led the task force that included 24 senior-level policy officials from across the federal government.

“With a growing number of recreational, scientific, energy, and security activities,” said Sutley, “we need a national policy that sets the United States on a new path for the conservation and sustainable use of these critical natural resources.”

“As we witness the gut-wrenching devastation in the Gulf of Mexico, this announcement is welcome news for the future health of our oceans,” said Bill Eichbaum, WWF vice president for marine policy. “We commend President Obama for his leadership in convening the task force and heeding its recommendations.”

In 2003 and 2004, reports issued by the Pew Oceans Commission and the U.S. Commission on Ocean Policy, respectively, warned that poor management and lack of coordination among federal agencies were threatening the health and economic productivity of our oceans, coasts, and Great Lakes.

“This first-of-its kind framework will help our nation plan wisely for the future of our oceans and coastlines, so that we can continue to experience their beauty and bounty for generations to come,” said Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar.

“Today, possibly more so than any point in our nation’s history, we appreciate that healthy oceans matter,” said Dr. Jane Lubchenco, administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

“The Task Force’s Final Recommendations provide a balance between protecting and preserving the marine environment, and promoting economic progress,” said said Admiral Bob Papp, Commandant of the U.S. Coast Guard. “The framework protects the interests of all users, improves ocean stewardship, and provides the foundation for improving maritime governance at the international, regional, state, and local levels.”

“The Department of the Navy strongly supports the principles and framework laid out in this new Executive Order,” said Donald Schregardus, deputy assistant secretary of the Navy for environment. “Strengthening the vital link between our global maritime mission and our responsibility to safeguard the environment is a key component to our environmental strategy. The establishment of the National Ocean Council will be important in advancing this strategic priority.”

California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger applauded the move, saying, “The Deepwater Horizon spill has emphasized what a vital role our oceans play in our environment, economy and overall well-being. California has long demonstrated leadership with ocean and coastal protection and we stand ready to continue assisting President Obama at all levels of government to ensure that we safeguard our treasured natural resources.”

The Interagency Ocean Policy Task Force has published its “interim” document for public comment you can find that document HERE. The agency is recommending restrictions on fishing in both saltwater and freshwater … “consistent with international law.”

  • (Since when does International Law tell the citizens of the USA whether or not they can fish! Also notice this isn’t about “commercial” fishing, it is SPORTS fishing!)

Shimano Corp: IRVINE, Calif. USA – October 5, 2009 – A recently published administration document outlines a structure that could result in closures of sport fishing in salt and freshwater areas across America. The White House created an Interagency Oceans Policy Task Force in June and gave them only 90 days to develop a comprehensive federal policy for all U.S. coastal, ocean and Great Lakes waters. Under the guise of ‘protecting’ these areas, the current second phase of the Task Force direction is to develop zoning which may permanently close vast areas of fishing waters nationwide. This is to be completed by December 9, 2009.

When you see this, DOUBT it!

When you see this, DOUBT it!

  • White House Memo: The original White House memo and not surprisingly the Task Force report contains multiple references to developing a national policy where Great Lakes and coastal regions are managed, “consistent with international law, including customary international law as reflected in the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea” – a 300-page treaty the U.S. has never ratified.

KeepAmericaFishing.org Without recreational angler input, decisions made under this national oceans policy could be used to unnecessarily close saltwater and freshwater recreational fishing areas.


The Bottom Line


Its not about fishing, is it? It is about this this administration once again taking a God-Given Liberty from us and replacing it with a “rule”.  The government, with any slight expansion of this “rule” will actually have the power to tell me I am not free to fish. This even though the sports fishermen in this country, without any government help, spend millions on making their fishing habitats even more viable and productive every year.

  • In fact, according to NOAA Fisheries, saltwater anglers contribute over $82 billion to the economy and support over half a million jobs.

Administration to ban Fishing!

No Fishing!

This is about a government reaching into our personal lives, once again, and taking away Liberty and Freedom. How much more of the “Nanny State” will you allow before YOU stand up and say “ENOUGH!”? Do you want President Obama telling you where and when you can fish? Do you want the United Nations setting the guidelines for fishing in your pond?

If the answer is “NO!” then you can take action one of two ways. Want to be part of the Patriotic Grassroots of this country? Here’s you chance, jump in an help make a difference:

From KeepAmericaFishing.org:

The Task Force’s Interim Report is currently under a public review and comment period.  The single most obvious flaw in the report is the omission of responsibly regulated recreational fishing as a key activity for the oceans and the Great Lakes.  In addition, as a national policy document governing the oceans and Great Lakes, the report is skewed toward a preservationist policy of locking up public waters instead of one that promotes sustainable uses such as recreational fishing.
  1. Send a letter to the White House Council on Environmental Quality urging the Task Force to include recreational fishing and boating in the national policy by simply copying this linked letter and pasting it into the form at this linkhttp://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/eop/ceq/initiati…
  • Press “send message” below to send the letter to your Members of Congress.
  • Go to the Interagency Ocean Policy Task Force site and fill out their form writing your own letter.

    "The Constitution is a Limiting Document" - Obama

    "The Constitution is a Limiting Document" - Obama

    Personal Note:

    One more time an “government agency” has sprung up without our knowledge, once more its “output” threatens Liberty and Freedom.   We’ve got to be fighting back from the grass roots.   There is NO Constitutional precedent for this. “Control of fishing” is on in the Constitution and the 10th amendment states the government then cannot regulate this aspect of our lives. Please send your thoughts to these people and tell them,

    • They do not have the authority to tell us where to fish (read the 10th amendment again)
    • We do not need guidelines, we already spend MILLIONS of our own dollars making sure our fishing environments are healthy and kept up to date.

    We need Patriotic grass roots help, even if you are not a fisherman, this is YOUR issue too.  Here is another perfect example of the government taking control of our lives … one “policy” at a time.  Please join all Patriots to say “NO!”

    Thank you

    Doug

    1st Navy Union Jack - Liberty Threatened

    Graham Joins Kerry (Cap N Trade)

    October 11th, 2009

    Today I am flying the 1st Navy Union Jack.  I fly this flag when Liberty is threatened … and today, once again, Lindsey Graham (R-SC) demonstrated his liberal leaning as he teamed up with John Kerry (D-MA) on a Cap and Trade (Climate) bill.  Graham is a RINO and should be drummed out of the Repuparty.

    Liberty Threatened

    Liberty Threatened

    Lindsey Graham (R-SC) announced on October 11th, 2009 that he is teaming up with John Kerry (D-MA) on Cap and Trade legislation:

    Liberals!

    Liberals! The one on the left admits it.

    Politico: Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina publicly announced his support for climate legislation on Sunday in an op-ed column with Democratic Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts. “Our partnership represents a fresh attempt to find consensus that adheres to our core principles and leads to both a climate change solution and energy independence,” the two senators wrote in The New York Times. “It begins now, not months from now — with a road to 60 votes in the Senate.” Graham’s support is a major win for climate supporters, who are seeking Republican support for climate legislation.

    Cap and Trade (What is it?) (AmericanProgress.Org)

    • The goal: To steadily reduce carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gas emissions economy-wide in a cost-effective manner.
    • The cap: Each large-scale emitter, or company, will have a limit on the amount of greenhouse gas that it can emit. The firm must have an “emissions permit” for every ton of carbon dioxide it releases into the atmosphere. These permits set an enforceable limit, or cap, on the amount of greenhouse gas pollution that the company is allowed to emit. Over time, the limits become stricter, allowing less and less pollution, until the ultimate reduction goal is met. This is similar to the cap and trade program enacted by the Clean Air Act of 1990, which reduced the sulfur emissions that cause acid rain, and it met the goals at a much lower cost than industry or government predicted.
    • The trade: It will be relatively cheaper or easier for some companies to reduce their emissions below their required limit than others. These more efficient companies, who emit less than their allowance, can sell their extra permits to companies that are not able to make reductions as easily. This creates a system that guarantees a set level of overall reductions, while rewarding the most efficient companies and ensuring that the cap can be met at the lowest possible cost to the economy.

    However …..

    $100,000,000,000+ tax! An internal Treasury Department memo recently revealed the Obama Administration knows its cap-and-trade plan could cost taxpayers $100 billion to $200 billion annually. This is unconscionable, especially for states like Indiana that rely on carbon-intensive electricity. The Senate legislation is also a hidden tax on the fuels Indianans depend on — gasoline, diesel, jet fuel and home heating oil. Farmers, truckers, deliverymen and many other workers would be hit hard as a result. Perhaps most ironically, this bill will have little to no impact on reversing global warming. If it does virtually nothing to address climate change and hurts us all with higher gasoline taxes, then why is Congress even considering it?

    And …..

    CO2/Global Warming is a myth! CanadaFreePress.com Proponents of human induced warming and climate change told us that an increase in CO2 precedes and causes temperature increases. They were wrong. They told us the late 20th century was the warmest on record. They were wrong. They told us, using the infamous “hockey stick” graph, the Medieval Warm Period (MWP) did not exist. They were wrong. They told us global temperatures would increase through 2008 as CO2 increased. They were wrong. They told us Arctic ice would continue to decrease in area through 2008. They were wrong. They told us October 2008 was the second warmest on record. They were wrong. They told us 1998 was the warmest year on record in the US. They were wrong it was 1934. They told us current atmospheric levels of CO2 are the highest on record. They are wrong. They told us pre-industrial atmospheric levels of CO2 were approximately 100 parts per million (ppm) lower than the present 385 ppm. They are wrong. This last is critical because the claim is basic to the argument that humans are causing warming and climate change by increasing the levels of atmospheric CO2 and have throughout the Industrial era.


    The Bottom Line


    1. There is no global warming, a global cooling trend is now predicted, (RightSideNews.com).

    2. Cap and Trade is a huge tax that will limit energy and cost the American Public $100,000,000,000 to $200,000,000,000 a year!!

    3. Lindsey Graham lied!. In his campaign commercials said he was a conservative … Cap and Trade is a LIBERAL proposal, he’s supporting Cap and Trade … therefore he’s a liberal and he lied about being a conservative.

    4. Lindsey Graham lied! Lindsey Graham is also supporting (bi-partisan effort) a Health Care Proposal … another LIBERAL proposal, Lindsey Graham, supporting this liberal proposal is demonstrating he is a liberal, therefore he lied about being a conservative.

    Three Questions for my Republican Friends here in South Carolina …

    1. Do you agree that Cap and Trade should be passed?
    2. Do you agree that Health Care should be passed?
    3. When you voted for Lindsey Graham, were you voting for Cap and Trade and Health Care reform?

    If you disagree with Graham’s actions … here are three ways to contact him:

    1. Write Lindsey Graham

    Washington Office
    290 Russell Senate Office Building
    Washington, DC 20510

    2. Phone Lindsey Graham

    Main: (202) 224-5972

    3. Email Lindsey Graham

    Email Link: HERE


    PS:  Yes I am a S.C. resident and no, I did not vote for Lindsey Graham.  I voted for his Democrat opponent (and I don’t even remember his name, and am not going to look it up now). When Graham beat the REAL conservative, Buddy Witherspoon in the Republican Primary, I “resigned” from the Republican Party.  There was no way I could campaign for the Republican Party when the faux conservative Lindsey Graham would be the candidate.  And you can see now, from the above … my vote wasn’t so crazy!  Lindsey Graham is why I am a Conservative Independent … and more proud of my decision every day!

    Doug (I-SC)


    Posted after the Post

    1. Lindsey Graham Out of Touch
    2. Lindsey Graham Avoids another Censure
    3. New York Times: SC Rift Hilights RNC Debate (Nov 28, 2009)

    1st Navy Union Jack - Liberty Threatened