Why did they lie about Missile?
On the evening of November the 8th, 2010, a contrail was recorded by KCBS TV. The official statement from the highest level of our government was:
(DoD statement attributed to Col. Dave Lapan, DoD spokesman)
While there is nothing at this time that leads the Department of Defense to believe this is a missile launch, the department and other US government agencies with expertise in aviation and space continue to look into the condensation trail (CONTRAIL) seen and reported off the coast of southern California on Monday evening.
All DoD entities with rocket and missile programs reported no launches, scheduled or inadvertent, during the time period in the area of the reported contrail. NORAD and USNORTHCOM confirmed that it did not monitor any foreign military missile launch off the California coast yesterday and has determined that there was no threat to the US homeland.
In addition, the FAA ran radar replays from Monday afternoon of a large area west of Los Angeles. Those replays did not reveal any fast-moving, unidentified targets. The FAA also did not receive reports of any unusual sightings from pilots who were flying in the area Monday afternoon.
If any new information comes to light in the coming days, we will update the press and public.
Now it becomes clear from experts that this was a contrail from a Chinese missile launched from a submerged Chinese submarine that had gone UNDETECTED by our submarine defenses.
For all of the information on this controversy, please watch the embedded video below:
From Joseph Farrah’s G2 Bulletin (via WND)
“The question that still must be answered is why NORAD’s muted response was simply that North America was not threatened, and later our government approved the lame excuse that the picture recorded was simply an aircraft leaving a contrail,” said retired U.S. Air Force Brig. Gen. Jim Cash.
“There is absolutely no doubt that what was captured on video off the coast of California was a missile launch, was clearly observed by NORAD, assessed by a four-star general in minutes, and passed to the president immediately,” he said.
Even more ominously, cautioned Cash: “We must question the timing of this shot across our bow. The president was abroad being diplomatic, which means trying to placate China which is becoming overly concerned with our handling a totally out-of-control deficit in spending.”
And don’t forget the Splendor (Jack Cashill)
Had the Chinese wanted to use more than words to show their ability to strip America of its creature comforts, they could not have chosen a more symbolic way than an EMP– electromagnetic pulse–attack on, say, a cruise ship like the Splendor.
As it happens, the Splendor lost its power early Monday, November 8, some 44 miles offshore and roughly 200 miles south of San Diego. No media report that I could find questioned the official “fire in the engine room” explanation. It may even be true.
Later that same day, however, about 300 miles north, the news crew spotted the apparent missile launch. With the presumed missile launch might we have been saying, “You can take out your cruise ships, but we can take out your country?” Or might the Chinese have been saying, “We have you got you squarely in our crosshairs?”
Summary: NORAD detected the missile launch, it was reviewed by a 4 star general and was reported in minutes to the President who was trying to negotiate with China at that moment. The decision to make the public statement that it was a “jet aircraft contrail” came from the President of the United States. Why would our government lie to us on such a subject? And why aren’t the people in California LIVID that, had the missile gone in the other direction and been nuclear tipped … they would all be history at this moment?
ThePatriotsFlag Post #31 on the Free Republic:
I’m not so sure about the EMT attack, it is pure speculation and folks here could come up with even wilder theories. What is more interesting is looking at the root cause of the speculation.And speculation that the Chinese were behind not only this but the “possible EMT” attack on the cruise ship Spendor earlier in the day can only continue to grow in the unhealthy environment of a press that never questions.
The speculation is not the problem, the problem is that the media doesn’t ask the questions they should … leaving any one of “us” nutcases to come up with our own theory. Why the media ignores seeking the truth on events like this is breathtakingly amazing. Pulitzer Prizes are collecting dust on the shelves while reporters spend time analyzing the social ramifications of Grammy Awards rather than researching a foreign missile fired 30 miles off our shore.
What fun it would be to be a young reporter today. All you have to do is find ONE of these many stories, track it to its source, and you are set for life. Book deals, movies, talk shows … fame! What opportunities they miss. Should I suppose this is trained out of them at reporter school (grade school?).
