Another Birth Certificate
Once again another birth certificate (COLB) has mysteriously appeared to support Obama’s claim that he is a “natural-born citizen” of the United States of America.
1. You have to wonder why this is even necessary.
2. Why is this an issue?
3. How could we “not know” or even “doubt” that he might not be a natural-born citizen?
4. And why are we now given a second “fake” certificate?
Answer for all questions … you need to do this to continue to prove the original lie. This so those who refuse to question will go forward as though no lie were told in the first place. Some people will believe anything, others need a little support!
An Amateur’s Proof:
This one doesn’t take a genius to investigate. Download the birth certificate from WhiteHouse.gov. According to Whitehouse.gov, this is an IMAGE (a digital photograph) that was put onto green security paper. If you scan an image, then all of the letters and numbers in the image will be about the same. (Try it yourself and see if you see differences, you will not). Then zoom in on this image to the “Department of Heath” number …61 10641. Now look at the last two digits (41) when you zoom in … you’ll see this:
Notice the difference between the pixels of the 4 and the 1. How can they be different if they are from the same SCANNED image? Not possible. Again, don’t take my word for it, try it yourself. Click on the link, go to the number and zoom … it’s not rocket science! But alas, there will be those doubters that will give me all kinds of scientific reasons why this is possible. So now I’ll refer to an expert. There are FOUR videos at YouTube by Orangegold1
An Expert’s Proof
Please watch all four videos … the first will lead you to the second, etc.
Also these two facts …
- The birth certificate that the White House released lists Obama’s birth as August 4, 1961. It also lists Barack Hussein Obama as his father. No big deal, right? At the time of Obama’s birth, it also shows that his father is aged 25 years old, and that Obama’s father was born in “Kenya, East Africa.” This wouldn’t seem like anything of concern, except the fact that Kenya did not even exist until 1963, two whole years after Obama’s birth, and 27 years after his father’s birth. How could Obama’s father have been born in a country that did not yet exist? Up and until Kenya was formed in 1963, it was known as the “British East Africa Protectorate.”
- The other item that I looked into was the hospital that Obama was born in. On the birth certificate released by the White House, the listed place of birth is “Kapi’olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital.” This cannot be, because the hospital(s) in question in 1961 were called “KauiKeolani Children’s Hospital” and “Kapi’olani Maternity Home,” respectively. The name did not change to Kapi’olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital until 1978, when these two hospitals merged. How can this particular name of the hospital be on a birth certificate dated 1961 if this name had not yet been applied to it until 1978?
- Look at the image below. Note that the world MALE is not on the same ‘curved’ slant with the rest of the lettering … this from Whistling … see #2 “Other References” below.
Note "Male" is not curved
And did the “author” of the forgery leave a “Smiley Face” as a clue?
Smiley Face added by forger?
Summary:
It is too bad that the “radical left” … (and obviously I must include the folks at Whitehouse.gov) … feel this is necessary. It only keeps the issue alive. What is amazing is how “poorly” this was done … it shows what a lack of respect they have for the “rest of us” that are not nearly as enlightened as them. That they think we would rely on this as “proof” is degrading and actually is a measurement of how “intelligent” they think we are.
There is a far bigger issue than the birth certificate. 53% of the voters in the USA voted for Obama. … although he was not vetted, although we saw no college transcripts, although we found no one who even knew him in college. When-ever!!! have we put a man up for president and didn’t know these “basics?” How could this happen. Again, it goes back to two basics … a “new media” this isn’t. And unfortunately, an education system that has not sufficiently trained our voting populace in the basics of American History. Many cannot tell you the name of the Vice President (Just ask Jey Len0) … but they would blindly vote for Hope and Change from a man who himself admits he is a “blank screen”.
Obama is not the problem … but a voting block who blindly believes in him or in a “hope and change” slogan is the REAL problem. The problem is not the birth certificate, it is only a symptom, but proof positive that people will still believe a lie … and continue to support it.
Other References to this “latest” birth certificate
This was Posted on the Free Republic and I wanted to document it here:
Posted on Saturday, May 14, 2011 11:44:20 PM by Article2-Section1-Clause 5
“President” Barry Soetoro aka Barack Obama is trying to create a marxist/socialist dictatorship. In order to achieve this, he and his Dem/RINO allies must destroy the U.S. Constitution, which stands directly in their way.
Soetoro and his allies are attempting to destroy the constitution by creating a wedge. The point of their attack is the NBC Clause. Soetoro and his Dem/RINO allies are trying to mainstream the idea that that clause of the constitution does not really matter. Once that section becomes delegitimized, they can do the same with other clauses in the constitution they don’t like, and so on.
Once you understand this, you understand the true motivations of a lot of pols out there. For example, Soetoro’s allies support him *because* he is not a natural born citizen, not in spite of it. This way, his non-NBC status becomes a tool for destroying the NBC clause of the constitution.
The Dem role in this deception is to, among other things, play the race card. They are out selling the idea that anyone who questions Soetoro’s legitimacy is a racist. No one wants to sound like a racist, so the idea that Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5 is important becomes further marginalized. (Racist clause written by old white men, so they like to say)
The RINO role in the deception is to propagate the idea that if the issue of Barry Soetoro’s legitimacy is pressed, then Republicans will lose in 2012. The point of this is to scare conservatives into silence. Don’t raise the issue or demand that your reps/candidates do the same, they say, or the dems’ll win. This scare tactic is a lie, as proven by numerous polls on the issue. The purpose of this line, like the purpose of the dem race card line, is to marginalize the importance of the NBC clause from the mainstream.
Barry Soetoro, and his communist/marxist/dem/RINO allies don’t really care that much about the NBC clause of the U.S. Constitution. They simply want to find a clause, *any* clause, that they can marginalize. Because once they marginalize one clause, then they can easily marginalize the next clause they don’t like, then the next, and so on. They have opportunistically zeroed in on Article 2, Section 1, Clause 5 as the first point of attack.
This is about more than just Barry Soetoro’s place of birth, or his forged certificate. This is about a subversive effort to de-legitimize the entire constitution, starting with one clause, and then all the way to a marxist dictatorship.
Posted on Friday, May 27, 2011 8:16:39 AM by bcsco
Subject: IT’S NEWLY ISSUED BIRTH CERTIFICATE IS A PROVEN FRAUD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
As you all know, Donald Trump made a big deal about Obama’s birth certificate. As of yesterday, the White House released the birth certificate.
I will tell you right now that I had never given this “birther” issue any credit. I watched the hype and the crazies come out. I completely dismissed the entire ordeal altogether. In fact, it was not until the White House released the birth certificate that it had gained my attention.
I am the studious sort of guy, and I have plenty of time on my hands. So, I took a close look at this document. While I would have thought that this issue would have been closed for good (and, got the crazies to crawl back into their holes), I found two extremely strange inconsistencies that merit some attention.
First of all, the birth certificate that the White House released lists Obama’s birth as August 4, 1961. It also lists Barack Hussein Obama as his father. No big deal, right? At the time of Obama’s birth, it also shows that his father is aged 25 years old, and that Obama’s father was born in “Kenya, East Africa”. This wouldn’t seem like anything of concern, except the fact that Kenya did not even exist until 1963, two whole years after Obama’s birth, and 27 years after his father’s birth. How could have Obama’s father have been born in a country that did not yet exist? Up and until Kenya was formed in 1963, it was known as the “British East Africa Protectorate”. But, this is not the only thing that I found that just does not jive.
The other item that I looked into was the hospital that Obama was born in. On the birth certificate released by the White House, the listed place of birth is “Kapi’olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital”. This cannot be, because the hospital(s) in question in 1961 were called “KauiKeolani Children’s Hospital” and “Kapi’olani Maternity Home”, respectively. The name did not change to Kapi’olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital until 1978, when these two hospitals merged. How can this particular name of the hospital be on a birth certificate dated 1961 if this name had not yet been applied to it until 1978?
Go ahead, look it up. I am not talking crazy talk, these are the facts. Like I said, I thought that this was a non-issue until the actual certificate was released. Now that it has been released, of course I had to look into it. I have found these issues, now I know that something is up. If you doubt me, just look at the following resources:
Sure as hell, the hospital part is true, as you can read about the 1978 merger here.
Who the hell did he payoff now with our TAX Dollars to print this Bogus Certificate??……