The REINS act – DeMint
DeMint Introduces REINS Act
13 GOP Senators Urge Congressional Oversight of Major Regulations Affecting the Economy
Today, U.S. Senator Jim DeMint (R-South Carolina), chairman of the Senate Steering Committee, was joined by 12 other Senators to introduce the REINS (Regulations from the Executive In Need of Scrutiny) Act. This legislation is intended to restore accountability to the process by which federal agencies finalize major regulations by requiring congressional approval for major regulatory actions. U.S. Congressman Geoff Davis (R-Kentucky) has already introduced similar legislation in the U.S. House, H.R. 3765.
Senator DeMint: “We must put a stop to the reckless and costly anti-free market regulations that are destroying jobs. When the Obama Administration hasn’t been able to ram their anti-job polices through Congress, they’ve empowered unelected, unaccountable bureaucrats to force them through using regulations. From the ongoing attempts to control the environment and the Internet to the forthcoming barrage of regulations facing the health care and financial industry, it’s no wonder that consumer costs are rising and businesses are reluctant to invest and grow.”
The REINS Act would require that every new major rule proposed by federal agencies be approved via joint resolution passed by both bodies in Congress and signed by the President before they can take effect. A “major rule” is any rule that the administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) finds may result in an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more; a major increase in costs or prices for consumers; or significant adverse effects on the economy.
Cosponsors of the REINS Act: U.S. Senators Tom Coburn (R-Oklahoma), John Cornyn (R-Texas), John Ensign (R-Nevada), Mike Enzi (R-Wyoming), Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), Orrin Hatch (R-Utah), Jim Inhofe (R-Oklahoma), James Risch (R-Idaho), Jeff Sessions (R-Alabama), John Thune (R-South Dakota), David Vitter (R-Louisiana), and Roger Wicker (R-Mississippi).
Examples of how the Act would function:
- One prime example of a major rule is the recent Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) final rule establishing a mandatory greenhouse gas emissions reporting program for sources with emissions that exceed 25,000 tons per year (74 Fed. Reg. 56,260). EPA estimates the cost of the rule at $115 million for the first year and $72 million on an annualized basis in subsequent years.
- A recent Congressional Research Service report finds that “the [Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act] gives federal agencies substantial responsibility and authority to ‘fill in the details’ of the legislation through subsequent regulations.” There are at least 40 provisions in the health care overhaul that require, permit or contemplate federal rule making.
The Bottom Line
The present law allows regulating agencies to “fill in the details” on spending and rule-making. The REINS act allows that ONLY if congress agrees to it … these keeps us from having a run-away Executive Branch that turns agencies loose to make any rules they want that the President would agree with … such as EPA regulations, etc.
It is time to REIN IN Congress
Here is a bona fide attempt to do just that.
Contemporary News Links
- News Release on REINS Act (09/22/10)
- HR 3765 Bill Summary and Status
- HR 3765 Text
- HR 3764 Activity
- No Major Regulation Without Congressional Approval (09.28.10)
- American Conservative Union endorses REINS Act (09.30.10)
- S.3826 — Regulations From the Executive in Need of Scrutiny Act of 2010
- S.3826 status as of 10.01.10
- Open Letter to Congress: REIN in Burdensome, Anti Free Market Regulations (10.06.10)
- Davis says GOP wants REINS Act and $1.3 TRILLION in spending cuts (10.09.10)

Tea Party Group Dynamics: This is all discussed in detail on the Patriot’s Flag Post “




