The Patriot's Flag

Once again, the President uses his own form of “new math” to tell another “little white lie”:

“Chrysler has repaid every dime and more of what it owes American taxpayers for their support during my presidency — and it repaid that money six years ahead of schedule.  And this week, we reached a deal to sell our remaining stake. That means soon, Chrysler will be 100 percent in private hands.”

Wow, “every dime and more” sounds like such a bargain. Not only did Chrysler pay back the loan, with interest — but the company paid back even more than they owed. Isn’t America great or what?

Not so fast. The president snuck in the weasel words “during my presidency” in his statement. What does that mean?

According to the White House, Obama is counting only the $8.5 billion loan that he made to Chrysler, not the $4 billion that President George W. Bush extended in his last month in office. However, Obama was not a disinterested observer at the time. According to The Washington Post article on the Bush loan, the incoming president called Bush’s action a “necessary step . . . to help avoid a collapse of our auto industry that would have had devastating consequences for our economy and our workers.”

Under the administration’s math, the U.S. government will receive $11.2 billion back from Chrysler, far more than the $8.5 billion Obama extended.

Through this sleight-of-hand accounting, the White House can conveniently ignore Bush’s loan, but even the Treasury Department admits that U.S. taxpayers will not recoup about $1.3 billion of the entire $12.5 billion investment when all is said and done.

The White House justifies not counting the Bush money because, it says, that money was completely spent when Obama was making a tough political decision on whether to extend another loan. In other words, a decision to do nothing at the time would have resulted in the immediate loss of the $4 billion that Bush had extended.

This is chicanery. Under the president’s math, Chrysler paid back 100 percent of Obama’s loan and less than 70 percent of Bush’s loan. A more honest presentation would combine the two figures to say U.S. taxpayers got back 90 percent of what they invested. In fact, that is how the Treasury and other administration officials frequently portray it; it is just when Obama speaks that the numbers get so squishy.

The White House justifies saying that Chrysler will be in 100 percent “in private hands” because there will no longer be government ownership once Fiat completes its purchase of the U.S. stake. For the record, the United Auto Workers will own 46 percent of the company.

The Botom Line

Obama’s Statement: Chrysler has repaid every dime and more of what it owes American taxpayers

Fact: U.S. taxpayers will not recoup about $1.3 billion of the entire $12.5 billion investment

That’s the “new math” from Obama …

Ain’t that Hope and Change great!   Soon they’ll be teaching this in school!

Sons of Liberty Flag - Liberty LOST!

Once again another birth certificate (COLB) has mysteriously appeared to support Obama’s claim that he is a “natural-born citizen” of the United States of America.

1. You have to wonder why this is even necessary.

2. Why is this an issue?

3. How could we “not know” or even “doubt” that he might not be a natural-born citizen?

4. And why are we now given a second “fake” certificate?

Answer for all questions … you need to do this to continue to prove the original lie.  This so those who refuse to question will go forward as though no lie were told in the first place.  Some people will believe anything, others need a little support!

An Amateur’s Proof:

This one doesn’t take a genius to investigate. Download the birth certificate from WhiteHouse.gov.  According to Whitehouse.gov, this is an IMAGE (a digital photograph) that was put onto green security paper.  If you scan an image, then all of the letters and numbers in the image will be about the same.  (Try it yourself and see if you see differences, you will not).  Then zoom in on this image to the “Department of Heath” number …61 10641.  Now look at the last two digits (41) when you zoom in … you’ll see this:

Notice the difference between the pixels of the 4 and the 1.  How can they be different if they are from the same SCANNED image?  Not possible.  Again, don’t take my word for it, try it yourself. Click on the link, go to the number and zoom … it’s not rocket science!  But alas, there will be those doubters that will give me all kinds of scientific reasons why this is possible.  So now I’ll refer to an expert.  There are FOUR videos at YouTube by Orangegold1

An Expert’s Proof

Please watch all four videos … the first will lead you to the second, etc.

Also these two facts …

1. The birth certificate that the White House released lists Obama’s birth as August 4, 1961. It also lists Barack Hussein Obama as his father. No big deal, right? At the time of Obama’s birth, it also shows that his father is aged 25 years old, and that Obama’s father was born in “Kenya, East Africa.” This wouldn’t seem like anything of concern, except the fact that Kenya did not even exist until 1963, two whole years after Obama’s birth, and 27 years after his father’s birth. How could Obama’s father have been born in a country that did not yet exist? Up and until Kenya was formed in 1963, it was known as the “British East Africa Protectorate.”
2. The other item that I looked into was the hospital that Obama was born in. On the birth certificate released by the White House, the listed place of birth is “Kapi’olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital.” This cannot be, because the hospital(s) in question in 1961 were called “KauiKeolani Children’s Hospital” and “Kapi’olani Maternity Home,” respectively. The name did not change to Kapi’olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital until 1978, when these two hospitals merged. How can this particular name of the hospital be on a birth certificate dated 1961 if this name had not yet been applied to it until 1978?
3. Look at the image below. Note that the world MALE is not on the same ‘curved’ slant with the rest of the lettering … this from Whistling … see #2 “Other References” below.

Note "Male" is not curved

And did the “author” of the forgery leave a “Smiley Face” as a clue?

Smiley Face added by forger?

Summary:

It is too bad that the “radical left” … (and obviously I must include the folks at Whitehouse.gov) … feel this is necessary.  It only keeps the issue alive.  What is amazing is how “poorly” this was done … it shows what a lack of respect they have for the “rest of us” that are not nearly as enlightened as them.  That they think we would rely on this as “proof” is degrading and actually is a measurement of how “intelligent” they think we are.

There is a far bigger issue than the birth certificate.  53% of the voters in the USA voted for Obama.  … although he was not vetted, although we saw no college transcripts, although we found no one who even knew him in college.  When-ever!!! have we put a man up for president and didn’t know these “basics?”  How could this happen.  Again, it goes back to two basics … a “new media” this isn’t.  And unfortunately, an education system that has not sufficiently trained our voting populace in the basics of American History.  Many cannot tell you the name of the Vice President (Just ask Jey Len0) … but they would blindly vote for Hope and Change from a man who himself admits he is a “blank screen”.

Obama is not the problem … but a voting block  who blindly believes in him or in a “hope and change” slogan is the REAL problem.  The problem is not the birth certificate, it is only a symptom, but proof positive that people will still believe a lie … and continue to support it.

Other References to this “latest” birth certificate

1. State Seal “missing” from this “official document” … it just continues (WMD)
2. Birth Certificate is a fake (Whstling)
3. Good Pictures and explanation here

Sons of Liberty Flag - Liberty LOST!, Uncategorized

To “cut spending” the President, in his budget proposal, has come up with some “difficult” decisions for cutting the spending.  For instance, cutting the program that helps poor people cut their heating bills … so they can stay safe and warm.  Oh, what a pity to have to cut this program … those poor people … but hey, we’ve got to make tough decisions, right?

What a JOKE this is. If people can’t see  through this one, then they deserve to have this man for “President” … sucking them dry and manipulating the weaker minds among us into believing he is a great man, and not the socialist, USA-hating, left-wing lib he really is. This is the best proof yet that Obama doesn’t care at all about the people he supposedly represents, everything he does is for HIS agenda. Here’s the headline:

PenLive.com: “Programs that help people pay their heating bills, train for a job and find affordable housing and child care would be cut in half under the $3.7 trillion budget Obama sent to Congress. Lawmakers are almost certain to seek major changes. Advocates for social service programs – and some lawmakers – said the cuts unfairly hit those most in need.

Obama proposed cutting the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program, which provides cash grants to senior citizens and families who can’t afford their heating bills, from $5 billion to $2.57 billion for the fiscal year that begins Oct. 1.”

Why is he doing this? (Cutting down his flying time and parties would cover most of this “spending cut”). But he does it for POLITICAL reasons alone.  It is simply a poorly disguised political trap for Republicans.

1. He proposes spending cuts and gets credit in the headlines, sadly shaking his head at what a dreadful decision he has to make cutting funding to the poor people.  “The poor man, having to make a decision like that” … watch the news media play this one!
2. And will the Republicans follow his direction? NO!  They won’t because they DO care about people. They will therefore fund this program again “in spite” of Obama’s “desire” to cut it.  If they don’t fund it, they will be accused of not funding heating money for the poor people. So they will fund it.
3. Result, Obama tried to cut the budget, but those darned Republicans wouldn’t let him … demonstrating how he is a hero to try to make the cuts, but the Republicans are the “big spenders.”

Spending cuts? He didn’t propose any spending cuts at all … it’s all a ruse for the non-thinking and low IQ voter. There seem to be a lot of them today, his constituency is dominated by them, obviously.

Most of what this man does as President is disgusting, but this is a new low. To use the poor people in this country, who actually do need our help, as “pawns” in Obama’s political gain is simply another Obamanation.  We are getting use to them aren’t we?

I guess you can’t call him a “thinking man’s President” … be cause if you think about what he is doing, you wouldn’t support him … no matter if you were rich or poor.

Washington Times – Budget cuts are Blarney!

Sons of Liberty Flag - Liberty LOST!

Nothing like “marketing” a Tragedy!

TUCSON, AZ — Some conservatives are upset over t-shirts bearing the logo “Together We Thrive: Tucson & America” that were handed out to attendees at tonight’s memorial service in the McKale Center on the campus of the University Of Arizona here.

The shirts, which bear the same logo that adorns other items from the event — including press passes, signage and volunteer t-shirts — were placed on many of the seats in the lower sections of the arena when tonight’s capacity crowd walked in. Quote from TMPDC

Will these people stop at nothing to “promote” this tragedy? Handing out “T-Shirt” to commemorate the memorial of the people “slain” in Tucson?  They made a “logo” for the memorial?

Maybe they should get some blood samples from the sidewalk and hand them out in little vials too! Nothing like a little clotted blood from fallen victims to help people “thrive together” better.  What kinds of morons do we have running this country? “Memorabilia” for a tragedy? These people are SICK!

OUTRAGEOUS!!!

Let’s Watch the Main Stream Media Cover this One!

Followup Links:

1. The Marxist Message behind the Memorial “Together we Thrive”

USA Flag - Day of Remembrance

Jan 12, 2011  A 66 percent increase in the individual state income tax passed the General Assembly early today and is on its way to Gov. Pat Quinn for his signature.  In the House, the contentious tax-hike bill was approved with 60 “yes” votes, the minimum number of votes needed for passage, to 57 “no.” No Republicans voted for Senate Bill 2505. Ten lame-duck Democrats — whose terms expire at noon today — all voted for the tax hike. See the House roll call. In the Senate, the vote was 30-29, also the minimum needed to pass the tax bill.

This is good. (Of course I don’t live in IL anymore). Good because taxes, if there are any, should be at the state level not at the federal level where the voter is too far removed from the tax/spend decisions. And the closer the people who CONTROL the tax are the to people voting to give them that control, the more the PEOPLE’s VOTE will count toward how the money is collected and spent. This is the way it was supposed to work. (Not taxes at the Fed Level).

The result is a local citizenry agreeing with the move or disagreeing with it. Then they vote those people in or out. The voters of IL have voted for people who are making higher taxes happen, the people have the RIGHT in this country to vote for such people. If the people in South Carolina want cake, but IL chooses broccoli, then so be it. The state should make that choice. The people either vote a change, or move to where living matches their lifestyle.

This is how the government was set up in the beginning. Not because of cake or broccoli, but because of religion. The last thing the founders wanted was a “federally” sanctioned religion. There were many religious sects the time and the states decided what they wanted or didn’t want. Then people moved to that place for the lifestyle the wanted to achieve; freedom of religion, freedom of choice.

We “react” to 66% taxes “passed” in IL. But we shouldn’t unless we live there. That is THEIR business, that’s what the people THERE have voted for, and the people in IL either condone it by voting them back in next time, or throw them out.

(The above posted by The Patriot’s Flag on the Free Republic)

The Bottom Line

Of course for those of us who disagree with higher taxes and more government control, the IL legislature is giving us an excellent example of why you should not ever vote for Democrats.  Not one Republican voted for this measure in IL.  But again, it is only a “lesson learned” for us … let them eat brocolli.

USA Flag - Day of Remembrance