<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Patriot&#039;s Flag</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thepatriotsflag.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thepatriotsflag.com</link>
	<description>Here is the reason for the Flag flown at my house today…</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 16:15:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Adopt-A-TeaParty by The Patriot&#39;s Flag &#187; Bluffton SC Tea Party Patriots</title>
		<link>http://www.thepatriotsflag.com/2010/02/adopt-a-teaparty/comment-page-1/#comment-179</link>
		<dc:creator>The Patriot&#39;s Flag &#187; Bluffton SC Tea Party Patriots</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 16:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepatriotsflag.com/?p=5094#comment-179</guid>
		<description>[...] function similar to this template, you should consider adopting a local Tea Party Group as I have, (See Adopt-A-TeaParty). This is a quick and easy way to give them a web presence and gives you an opportunity to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] function similar to this template, you should consider adopting a local Tea Party Group as I have, (See Adopt-A-TeaParty). This is a quick and easy way to give them a web presence and gives you an opportunity to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 9-12 DC by The Patriot&#39;s Flag &#187; Ratigan&#8217;s Tea Party</title>
		<link>http://www.thepatriotsflag.com/9-12-dc/comment-page-1/#comment-177</link>
		<dc:creator>The Patriot&#39;s Flag &#187; Ratigan&#8217;s Tea Party</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 23:19:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepatriotsflag.com/?page_id=711#comment-177</guid>
		<description>[...] 9-12 DC [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 9-12 DC [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Getting State Sovereingty (SC) by The Patriot&#39;s Flag &#187; Bluffton SC Tea Party Patriots</title>
		<link>http://www.thepatriotsflag.com/2010/02/getting-state-sovereingty-sc/comment-page-1/#comment-176</link>
		<dc:creator>The Patriot&#39;s Flag &#187; Bluffton SC Tea Party Patriots</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 02:19:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepatriotsflag.com/?p=4484#comment-176</guid>
		<description>[...] (South Carolina State Sovereignty &#8230; Patriot&#8217;s Flag Post &#8211; &#8220;Getting States Sovereignty, SC&#8221;) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (South Carolina State Sovereignty &#8230; Patriot&#8217;s Flag Post &#8211; &#8220;Getting States Sovereignty, SC&#8221;) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Got State Sovereignty? by The Patriot&#39;s Flag &#187; Bluffton SC Tea Party Patriots</title>
		<link>http://www.thepatriotsflag.com/2009/09/got-state-sovereignty/comment-page-1/#comment-175</link>
		<dc:creator>The Patriot&#39;s Flag &#187; Bluffton SC Tea Party Patriots</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 02:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepatriotsflag.com/?p=1599#comment-175</guid>
		<description>[...] (What is State Sovereignty? &#8230; Patriot&#8217;s Flag Post &#8211; &#8220;Got State Sovereignty&#8220;) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (What is State Sovereignty? &#8230; Patriot&#8217;s Flag Post &#8211; &#8220;Got State Sovereignty&#8220;) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Obama&#8217;s Far Left Czars by Doug</title>
		<link>http://www.thepatriotsflag.com/2010/01/obamas-far-left-czars/comment-page-1/#comment-174</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 19:46:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepatriotsflag.com/?p=4038#comment-174</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;Schiffer promises to introduce this legislation in Congress after election to Congress. Schiffer explained:      “I believe ‘Czars’ are un-American. It started out as almost an inside-the-Beltway joke under Republican Administrations—calling a Presidential adviser a ‘Czar.’ But the idea of Presidential ‘Czars’ has become a worrying trend. If we continue on this path, Presidential over-use of White House ‘Czars’ threatens to weaken America’s democratic system.”   Schiffer stated:      “Placing the authority for Executive Branch business under unelected, unaccountable ‘Czars’ confuses and undermines our American system. The U.S. Constitution establishes the idea of Departments whose heads must be confirmed by the U.S. Senate. Concentrating more and more power in the hands of ‘Czars’ has the effect of setting up a whole new, alternative ‘shadow government’ outside of our American system. This is creating worry among some patriots that at a time of national crisis and confusion, these Czars could serve as a power center outside of our established American system of Departments, with Secretaries confirmed by the United States Senate.”   Paul Schiffer further clarified:      “My legislation allows Presidents to have any advisors they want, and call them anything they want. However, White House advisors like ‘Czars’ will have no authority over any part of the U.S. Government. My legislation would prohibit any White House advisor from exercising authority over any Federal or State government official, employee, office or department, and would protect every government official and employee from not obeying any White House advisor other than the President himself. The President, of course, is the Chief Executive of the Executive Branch and the President may always act under his own authority in his own name. Obviously, my legislation creates exceptions for any special chain of command established by statute that might be agreed to between the Congress and the President, such as with national security matters.” &quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Canada Free Press&lt;/a&gt;

Paul Schiffer on intruducing Non-Czar Legislation

Schiffer promises to introduce this legislation in Congress after election to Congress. Schiffer explained:

    “I believe ‘Czars’ are un-American. It started out as almost an inside-the-Beltway joke under Republican Administrations—calling a Presidential adviser a ‘Czar.’ But the idea of Presidential ‘Czars’ has become a worrying trend. If we continue on this path, Presidential over-use of White House ‘Czars’ threatens to weaken America’s democratic system.” 

Schiffer stated:

    “Placing the authority for Executive Branch business under unelected, unaccountable ‘Czars’ confuses and undermines our American system. The U.S. Constitution establishes the idea of Departments whose heads must be confirmed by the U.S. Senate. Concentrating more and more power in the hands of ‘Czars’ has the effect of setting up a whole new, alternative ‘shadow government’ outside of our American system. This is creating worry among some patriots that at a time of national crisis and confusion, these Czars could serve as a power center outside of our established American system of Departments, with Secretaries confirmed by the United States Senate.” 

Paul Schiffer further clarified:

    “My legislation allows Presidents to have any advisors they want, and call them anything they want. However, White House advisors like ‘Czars’ will have no authority over any part of the U.S. Government. My legislation would prohibit any White House advisor from exercising authority over any Federal or State government official, employee, office or department, and would protect every government official and employee from not obeying any White House advisor other than the President himself. The President, of course, is the Chief Executive of the Executive Branch and the President may always act under his own authority in his own name. Obviously, my legislation creates exceptions for any special chain of command established by statute that might be agreed to between the Congress and the President, such as with national security matters.”</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="Schiffer promises to introduce this legislation in Congress after election to Congress. Schiffer explained:      “I believe ‘Czars’ are un-American. It started out as almost an inside-the-Beltway joke under Republican Administrations—calling a Presidential adviser a ‘Czar.’ But the idea of Presidential ‘Czars’ has become a worrying trend. If we continue on this path, Presidential over-use of White House ‘Czars’ threatens to weaken America’s democratic system.”   Schiffer stated:      “Placing the authority for Executive Branch business under unelected, unaccountable ‘Czars’ confuses and undermines our American system. The U.S. Constitution establishes the idea of Departments whose heads must be confirmed by the U.S. Senate. Concentrating more and more power in the hands of ‘Czars’ has the effect of setting up a whole new, alternative ‘shadow government’ outside of our American system. This is creating worry among some patriots that at a time of national crisis and confusion, these Czars could serve as a power center outside of our established American system of Departments, with Secretaries confirmed by the United States Senate.”   Paul Schiffer further clarified:      “My legislation allows Presidents to have any advisors they want, and call them anything they want. However, White House advisors like ‘Czars’ will have no authority over any part of the U.S. Government. My legislation would prohibit any White House advisor from exercising authority over any Federal or State government official, employee, office or department, and would protect every government official and employee from not obeying any White House advisor other than the President himself. The President, of course, is the Chief Executive of the Executive Branch and the President may always act under his own authority in his own name. Obviously, my legislation creates exceptions for any special chain of command established by statute that might be agreed to between the Congress and the President, such as with national security matters.” " rel="nofollow">Canada Free Press</a></p>
<p>Paul Schiffer on intruducing Non-Czar Legislation</p>
<p>Schiffer promises to introduce this legislation in Congress after election to Congress. Schiffer explained:</p>
<p>    “I believe ‘Czars’ are un-American. It started out as almost an inside-the-Beltway joke under Republican Administrations—calling a Presidential adviser a ‘Czar.’ But the idea of Presidential ‘Czars’ has become a worrying trend. If we continue on this path, Presidential over-use of White House ‘Czars’ threatens to weaken America’s democratic system.” </p>
<p>Schiffer stated:</p>
<p>    “Placing the authority for Executive Branch business under unelected, unaccountable ‘Czars’ confuses and undermines our American system. The U.S. Constitution establishes the idea of Departments whose heads must be confirmed by the U.S. Senate. Concentrating more and more power in the hands of ‘Czars’ has the effect of setting up a whole new, alternative ‘shadow government’ outside of our American system. This is creating worry among some patriots that at a time of national crisis and confusion, these Czars could serve as a power center outside of our established American system of Departments, with Secretaries confirmed by the United States Senate.” </p>
<p>Paul Schiffer further clarified:</p>
<p>    “My legislation allows Presidents to have any advisors they want, and call them anything they want. However, White House advisors like ‘Czars’ will have no authority over any part of the U.S. Government. My legislation would prohibit any White House advisor from exercising authority over any Federal or State government official, employee, office or department, and would protect every government official and employee from not obeying any White House advisor other than the President himself. The President, of course, is the Chief Executive of the Executive Branch and the President may always act under his own authority in his own name. Obviously, my legislation creates exceptions for any special chain of command established by statute that might be agreed to between the Congress and the President, such as with national security matters.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lindsey Graham&#8217;s Wall of Shame by Doug</title>
		<link>http://www.thepatriotsflag.com/2009/12/lindsey-grahams-wall-of-shame/comment-page-1/#comment-173</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 19:22:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepatriotsflag.com/?p=3506#comment-173</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://gatewaypundit.firstthings.com/2010/03/lindsey-graham-meets-with-obama-white-house-to-plot-next-amnesty-bill/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Gateway Pundit&lt;/a&gt;
Graham meets with Obama to work out new Amnesty Bill.

&lt;strong&gt;Grahamnesty!&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://gatewaypundit.firstthings.com/2010/03/lindsey-graham-meets-with-obama-white-house-to-plot-next-amnesty-bill/" rel="nofollow">Gateway Pundit</a><br />
Graham meets with Obama to work out new Amnesty Bill.</p>
<p><strong>Grahamnesty!</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on ClimateGate&#8217;s Blue Dress by Doug</title>
		<link>http://www.thepatriotsflag.com/2009/11/climategates-blue-dress/comment-page-1/#comment-170</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 15:23:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepatriotsflag.com/?p=3071#comment-170</guid>
		<description>&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thepatriotsflag.com/docs/hockystick.jpg&quot;&gt;


&lt;a href=&quot;http://pajamasmedia.com/zombie/2010/02/25/new-global-warming-data-reveals-accurate-hockey-stick-graph/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Full Image HERE&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.thepatriotsflag.com/docs/hockystick.jpg"/></p>
<p><a href="http://pajamasmedia.com/zombie/2010/02/25/new-global-warming-data-reveals-accurate-hockey-stick-graph/" rel="nofollow">Full Image HERE</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Taking Back the Baby Steps by The Patriot&#39;s Flag &#187; McCain Lost, That&#8217;s Good!</title>
		<link>http://www.thepatriotsflag.com/2010/02/taking-back-the-baby-steps/comment-page-1/#comment-169</link>
		<dc:creator>The Patriot&#39;s Flag &#187; McCain Lost, That&#8217;s Good!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 15:07:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepatriotsflag.com/?p=4507#comment-169</guid>
		<description>[...] past 30 years &#8230; on the longer time line, you see it clearly.  I&#8217;ve written about that HERE: Take back the baby steps! So now we have OBAMA. [screaming heard in the background!]. However with the election of Obama and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] past 30 years &#8230; on the longer time line, you see it clearly.  I&#8217;ve written about that HERE: Take back the baby steps! So now we have OBAMA. [screaming heard in the background!]. However with the election of Obama and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Tea Party Group Dynamics by The Patriot&#39;s Flag &#187; Bluffton SC Tea Party Patriots</title>
		<link>http://www.thepatriotsflag.com/2010/02/tea-party-group-dynamics/comment-page-1/#comment-165</link>
		<dc:creator>The Patriot&#39;s Flag &#187; Bluffton SC Tea Party Patriots</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 01:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepatriotsflag.com/?p=5124#comment-165</guid>
		<description>[...] Tea Party Group Dynamics &#8230; How to interface a Tea Party Group, what to expect, what to do, pitfalls, challenges and pure patriotic pride! This can help us understand how to work together efficiently, securing success, as failure simply is not an option! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Tea Party Group Dynamics &#8230; How to interface a Tea Party Group, what to expect, what to do, pitfalls, challenges and pure patriotic pride! This can help us understand how to work together efficiently, securing success, as failure simply is not an option! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Conservativism &#8211; The Divided Attack by The Patriot&#39;s Flag &#187; Tea Party Group Dynamics</title>
		<link>http://www.thepatriotsflag.com/2010/02/conservativism-the-divided-attack/comment-page-1/#comment-164</link>
		<dc:creator>The Patriot&#39;s Flag &#187; Tea Party Group Dynamics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 20:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepatriotsflag.com/?p=4958#comment-164</guid>
		<description>[...] energy being siphoned off by parasitic elements is heightened.  As stated in an earlier post (Conservatism-The Divided Attack) organizations, political parties, candidates &#8230; all are like &#8220;vehicles.&#8221;   All [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] energy being siphoned off by parasitic elements is heightened.  As stated in an earlier post (Conservatism-The Divided Attack) organizations, political parties, candidates &#8230; all are like &#8220;vehicles.&#8221;   All [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
